Pro-Vaccine Immunologist Admits a Shocking Truth About Vaccines
Posted on October 31, 2011
For several years, until April of this year, I had been lecturing nationally to health professionals about the great vaccine hoax. Attending one such seminar was a board member of an association of health professionals, who invited me to speak on this subject at their national conference. I did, and had 90 minutes to present the most salient points from my 12-hour seminar. It caused quite a stir, and several clinicians thanked me for having the courage to speak the truth about this controversial subject.
Later that day, I sat on a panel of four experts to answer questions from conference attendees. Many of the questions were directed at the PhD immunologist on the panel, asking if the statements I had made in
the morning presentation were true. To my surprise, the immunologist confirmed every assertion I had made.
The first was that it is pointless to administer drugs intended to stimulate antibody production to babies who are too young to produce antibodies. Infants in their first year mostly depend on generalized, non-specific immunity, including (hopefully) immunoglobulins from breast milk, to protect their young bodies from infection. They do not produce antibodies of their own until about age one. Despite this basic fact, the medical establishment insists administering a total of 19 shots, containing 24 vaccines, to infants on the 2, 4 and 6 month pediatric visits Somehow, the basic facts of human physiology and development do not apply to vaccines.
You can listen to an <http:>audio file of an exchange between an attendee and the immunologist about this question. She declined to be identified in my presentations, including this post, perhaps because she knows that anyone who speaks the truth about vaccines is savaged by the medical establishment and </http:>
their compliant lapdogs in the mainstream media. It is professional suicide for anyone in conventional medicine to question the unquestionable (yet unproven) assumptions about vaccines: that they are effective, safe and necessary. I have stopped lecturing publicly on this subject for the same reason, because the attacks in recent
years have become particularly vicious; and because my main message in my teachings is about personal responsibility, innate wholeness and opening to the largeness of who we are, not just vaccines.
Here's the transcript of this shocking exchange:
Q. So the science seems fairly clear that for the first year of life, probably, that the immunization is not stimulating the kind of response we expect it to stimulate.
Q. So what's the rationale for continuing to do that if it's not doing what it's supposed to be [doing]?
A. The vaccines are given at pediatric wellness visits, and the idea is that you are training the parent to bring their child in at all the pediatric wellness visits, and that it's only the year visit that actually is truly important. But that for most parents you are not going to get them to bring their kid in if they don't come in at two months, four months, and six months. And so it's actually more of a training thing.
It's interesting, I was on the phone with [?] county public health last week, with one of their vaccine nurses. She was like, 'Oh, you're talking about vaccines? Make sure you tell them they have to do that year shot because the first three [the 2, 4 and 6 month shots] don't work.' I was like, 'Yeah, I know.' [laughter].
Now, the person speaking here is not some kid with a blog. This is an impeccably-credentialed, pro-vaccine PhD immunologist. She knows more about the detailed intricacies of human immunology than I ever will. I have great respect for her, and her decades of dedicated work in this field. And I was so glad I was sitting right next to her as she confirmed what I and others have been saying for years.
Though I am not lecturing anymore publicly on the vaccine scam, I have a <http:>recording of the seminar available, with slides, notes, articles, etc., if you are interested in more on this subject.</http:>
Let's muster the courage to question the Unquestionable Vaccine Assumptions, and ask, "Are they effective? Are they safe? Are they necessary?" The best, most rigorous science we have says "No," or, at least, "We don't know," to all three questions. And clear, independent thinking about it generally concludes that vaccines are about profit, not health. I've had a natural family health practice for 21 years, and have never told a parent not to vaccinate their
kids. That's a personal decision. Bottom line: ask the tough questions, find your own answers, and decide for yourself. Our future is at stake.
For more essential and untold facts on vaccines, visit my <http:>free radio show archive and check out the interviews with Dr Jeff Prystupa, DC, Toxicologist, and Alan Phillips, Esq. of vaccinerights.com. I invite you to join over 40,000 folks worldwide who have subscribed to my radio show podcast, </http:>
on our <http:></http:>home page.