Friday, December 29, 2017

FDA Closing Statement on Gardasil

The 2008 FDA Closing Statement on Gardasil reports that 73.3% of the ‘healthy’ girls who participated in the clinical trials developed new medical conditions. The list below highlights some of the conditions reported in the 2008 FDA Closing Statement on Gardasil:
◦Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders 2.9% = 1 in 34
◦Gastrointestinal Disorders 13.4% = 1 in 7
◦General & Administration Site Conditions 3.8% = 1 in 33
◦Immune System Disorders 2.4% =1 in 50
◦Infections & Infestations 52.9% = 1 in 2
◦Injury, Poisoning, & Procedural Complications 8.0% =1 in 12
◦Investigations 11.8% =1 in 9
◦Musculoskeletal & Connective Tissue Disorders 6.8% =1 in 14
◦Nervous System Disorders 9.4% = 1 in 10
◦Pregnancy, Puerperium & Perinatal Conditions 2.0% = 1 in 50
◦Psychiatric Disorders 4.4% =1 in 22
◦Renal Disorders 2.7% =1 in 37
◦Reproductive & Brest Disorders 24.8 % = 1 in 14
◦Respiratory, Thoracic & Mediastinal Disorders 5.5% = 1 in 18
◦Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders 7.4% = 1 in 13
◦Surgical Procedures = Appendectomy 10.2% = 1 in 10

Sanofi Dengue Vaccine: Dengvaxia Poses Serious Risk for Children

Sanofi Dengue Vaccine: Dengvaxia Poses Serious Risk for Children

This is a developing news story focusing on the corruption of industry-initiated government vaccination policies. The case involves Sanofi and the launching of its Dengvaxia vaccine in a massive school-based Dengvaxia vaccination campaign in 830,000 Philippino school children.
The New York Times has just published its report,   noting that: “public health experts are worried that the distrust could spill over to other vaccination programs.”
Full story here:

History of Big Pharma Fraud & Manipulations

How Pharmaceutical Companies Get Away With Criminal Fraud and Deception – MDBAD
Dr. Jennifer Daniels on Rockefeller Medicine and Health Freedom
Dr. Jennifer Daniels joins the show to discuss the history of Rockefeller medicine, the medical industrial complex and the virtues of alternative therapy. We talk about the fundamental corruption of the current medical system and how medical freedom and personal responsibility are the solutions to our health problems and many societal ills.
5 Horrifying Facts about the FDA Vaccine Approval Process
5 Facts about the FDA Vaccine Approval Process That Will Horrify You
Think the government is watching out for your family’s health? Think again. In this exclusive free report by award-winning journalist Jeremy R. Hammond, you’ll learn:
Why the perception of the government as an overseer of the pharmaceutical industry is wrong
The frightening reality about the studies the FDA relies on to assess vaccine safety
The shocking truth about how vaccine manufacturers conduct clinical trials
How pharmaceutical companies can get their products “fast tracked” through the FDA
Why the vaccine industry was threatened with bankruptcy and the Orwellian “social bargain” the government legislated to save it
Read more:
How the Public Is Being Misinformed About Vaccine Safety and Efficacy
CDC Lies About the Risks of Vaccination of Preterm Infants
Scientists Point Out Corruption in Vaccine’s Promotion (Gardasil)
February 3, 2013
Merck Funded Study Reports Gardasil Vaccine 100% "Safe and Effective?" December 21, 2017
It is a documented fact that since the introduction of the human papillomavirus vaccination (HPV) in 2006, there have been more reports of adverse reactions than with any other vaccine. According to the WHO VigiAccess database, as of December 11, 2017, 81,340 reports of adverse reactions have been filed. These include 36,062 reports of nervous system disorders; 2,241 cardiac disorders (including 35 cardiac arrests); 460 POTS; over 3,000 seizures or epilepsy; 8,124 syncope; and 342 deaths. Despite this evidence being recorded on the World Health Organization’s own database, according to a press release, published by EurekAlert - The Global Source for Science News, the HPV vaccine is virtually 100% safe and effective. The study and accompanying research were funded by Merck, the manufacturer of the vaccine.
The Drug Story-A Factological History Of America's $10,000,000,000 Drug Cartel, Its Methods, Operations, Hidden Ownership, Profits And Terrific Impact On The Health Of The American People.
Iatrogenic Death - are doctors now the biggest cause of death?
Origins of Medical Industry Corruption
Allopathic Reductionism
Dr. Glidden explains the difference between what medicine practice our doctors really follow, and how their training is not near as superior to wholistic medicine practices.
MEDICINE KILLS MILLIONS (direct data and statistics)
Conventional Medicine is the Leading Cause of Death
While drug companies profit billions, people are dying by the millions.
These 13 Corporations Are "Big Pharma": Their History, Crimes, and Products
Our Stories
SSRI Stories is a collection of over 6,000 stories that have appeared in the media (newspapers, TV, scientific journals) in which prescription drugs were mentioned and in which the drugs may be linked to a variety of adverse outcomes including violence.
Western Medicine is Rockefeller Medicine – All The Way
Benjamin Rush
U.S. Founding Father, Signer of The Declaration of Independence
Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of Men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of the Republic should make a Special privilege for medical freedoms as well as religious freedom.
Generation SICK: The Power, Politics and Propaganda Behind America's Health Crisis Paperback – January 10, 2016
by Dr. Vic Naumov (Author)
Pharmacopoeia ...the sorceries of Babylon
Pharmakeia (aka sorceries) of Babylon
The Lucifarian ... Attack.
King James Bible
And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.
King James Bible
And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:
Revelation 18: 23, "By Thy Sorceries Were All Nations Deceived."
FDA, DEA running massive conspiracy to criminalize Kratom in order to protect Big Pharma’s obscene opioid profits…
First the DEA, now the FDA is trying to ban kratom: don’t let them…/
New Harvard study reveals institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals & how the FDA cannot be trusted with public safety.
According to Harvard report, in US alone, every week, 53,000 end up in hospitals & 2,400 die as a result of taking prescription drugs as prescribed.
Total corruption: Drug companies bought their way onto FDA advisory panels
It is now an undeniable fact that the pharmaceutical industry weaseled its way onto key U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panels, which were instrumental in shaping the way drugs are safety tested and approved. According to The Washington Post (WP), a recent public records request has revealed that drug companies purchased special access onto these panels, where they were given the keys to the kingdom in swaying decision-makers about official drug policy.
The FDA continues to be one of the most dangerous government agencies in the United States. The sheer scope of people it affects with its corruption is staggering.
Constitutional Attorney on US Federal Drug Administration (FDA) Corruption, Disinformation and Cover Up of Health Dangers
The FDA buries evidence of fraud in medical trials.
For more than a decade, the FDA has shown a pattern of burying the details of misconduct.
FDA Let Drugs Approved on Fraudulent Research Stay on the Market
Lies and Deception: How the FDA Does Not Protect Your Best Interests.
The FDA’s About To Get More Corrupt: New Commissioner Is “The Ultimate Insider”

Vaccines Destroy Immune Balance

Vaccines Destroy Immune Balance Through Abnormal Route Of Entry & Toxic Ingredients
Dr. Wakefield says that vaccines cause autism and explains in detail why adjuvants used in vaccines to stimulate a TH2 antibody immune response causes an abnormal overload and stress on the immune system that leads to immune dysfunction, which can lead to a wide variety of chronic health problems. Vaccination bypasses the TH1 cellular responses (responsible for 80% of our immune function according to Dr. Toni Bark) yet the immune system works best when both TH1 and TH2 work synergistically together. Vaccination destroys the synergy of the immune system because injection bypasses normal route of entry (through the lungs, often times) whereby TH1 cell response is the first response to happen. An antibody response is not an indicator of immunity, only of an allergic response. Natural immunity and being vaccine free is the healthiest option for children.
Vaccines Cause Chronic Immune System Dysregulation
Your Immune System, How It Works And How Vaccines Damage It
How Vaccines Dysregulate The Immune System
Anatomy and Physiology of the Immune System, Part 4
How pharmaceuticals destroy nature
Understanding immunity requires more than immunology
An Immune Disorder at the Root of Autism
A Mouse Model for the Immune Dysregulation Subtype of Autism, (And they would still claim to that there is no way vaccines have and can cause autism? That conclusion is of course clearly preposterous.)

Truth about Tetanus Vaccine

Tetanus and this also applies to rabies I believe.
It takes at least 14 days to offer protection from a tetanus vaccine. What you require for immediate protection is tetnoimmunoglobulin and this is available at any hospital. It is not a drug but a "live blood product"
What it is is the blood taken from someone who had had tetanus or had been immunised against tetanus and the tetanus antibodies isolated and basically offers immediate short term protection against tetanus.
Unless you work on a farm with animals and have your hands on their pooh and if the wound has bled then you do NOT need to have a tetanus shot.
Fun facts on tetanus that clearly most doctors don't know (or lie about) since they give the DTaP vaccine for even sinus infections and any minor cut:
1. Tetanus is an anaerobic bacteria meaning it can't survive in oxygenated environments meaning if the wound bled, NO tetanus.
2. Just because you get cut on metal (rusty or not), it doesn't automatically mean tetanus bacteria is present. Tetanus is normally found in manure/dirt and not on a clean plumbing fixture.
3. Even if there was a deep puncture wound that did not bleed, caused by an object that had tetanus bacteria on it, you literally can NOT "vaccinate" against a bacterial infection AFTER the exposure. The vaccine is not an instant tetanus killer; it would take weeks for your body to produce enough antibodies (provided the vaccine is even successful at all).
4. If there were serious concerns about tetanus exposure (as previously explained) then the ONLY thing that could help (outside of allowing the wound to bleed, if possible, and cleaning the wound with soap, water, or hydrogen peroxide) would be the TiG shot (tetanus immunoglobulin), which is an anti-toxin and not a vaccine.
5. There is no "tetanus vaccine" available in the United States, only the DTaP which is a 3-in-1 cocktail vaccine consisting of Diptheria, Tetanus & Pertussis (whooping cough) or Td (tetanus and diphtheria).
To summarize:
1. A tetanus shot would not help a current case of tetanus as a vaccine takes several weeks to create antibodies. If a current case of tetanus is truly a concern, the TiG shot is what should be given.
2. According to the VAERS database, reactions to vaccines for tetanus and diptheria are not rare. As of August 2012, there were over 22,000 adverse reactions reported and 67 deaths.
3. Lastly, the CDC states that efficacy of the tetanus toxoid has never been studied in a vaccine trial.
Copied and pasted, please feel free to do the same!

It’s time doctors updated their understanding of encephalitis

It’s time doctors updated their understanding of encephalitis
A paper in the Indian journal Current Science suggests an unexpected cause for the inflammatory brain disease — encephalitis — found in Malkangiri district of Odisha. For many years, this recurring outbreak, which killed over 100 children last year, was thought to be due to the Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus. Now researchers say it was likely due to the consumption of a wild bean, called Bada Chakunda, which grows freely in the region. Like several natural toxins, the anthraquinones in the bean don’t harm healthy people, but cause fatal dysfunction of the liver, heart and brain in underfed children. This finding draws on the researchers’ previous work in Uttar Pradesh’s Saharanpur district, where too a recurrent encephalitis outbreak was traced to this bean. While more data may be needed to confirm this link, it is clear the Malkangiri scourge wasn’t JE. This is only the latest in a series of such investigations in which suspected pockets of JE turned out to be something else. An illness around for three decades in U.P.’s Gorakhpur turned out, primarily, to be scrub typhus last year, while epidemics in Bihar’s Muzaffarpur were linked to lychee consumption, again among emaciated children. In all these cases, the suspicion of JE, though the epidemiology and symptoms didn’t match, delayed the discovery of the cause.

Why does this keep happening? One answer is that JE was indeed the biggest cause of encephalitis in India for decades, and today the public health diagnostic machinery is built around this illness. But as JE vaccination rates have grown, incidence has shrunk, and a host of other causes of encephalitis, like dengue, scrub typhus, herpes simplex and the West Nile virus, have emerged to the forefront. Yet, investigating agencies such as the National Centre for Disease Control and the National Institute of Virology have persisted in focussing on JE. Another problem is the archaic format in which encephalitis is reported to the government. This too is a relic of the pre-JE-vaccination era. Under this format, if an encephalitis case cannot be confirmed as JE, doctors tag it as Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES), a term that has now crept into medical literature. But AES is no diagnosis, just a temporary label for different unnamed diseases. Classifying them all under one head gives doctors the false sense of security of having pinpointed the illness, the researchers behind the Malkangiri finding argue. It is time for Indian investigators to update their understanding of encephalitis and look at outbreaks through a wider lens. If JE made 2,043 Indians sick this year, the mysterious AES is reported to have affected six times as many. A fixation with JE means the numerous patients in the second group may never get a diagnosis.

History of the Small Pox Vaccine

Vaccination a Delusion (S536: 1898)

 For the full book please click

Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: This monographic criticism of vaccination was published in the spring of 1898, then incorporated into Wallace's The Wonderful Century that fall. Reproduced below is the text of the original spring 1898 Swan Sonnenschein & Co. edition. Footnotes are collected into a single list at the end (after the Index), prior to the presentation of the twelve diagrams (which in the original were inserted at the very end of the work, as unpaginated fold-outs). Original pagination indicated within double brackets. To link directly to this page, connect with:

Among the greatest self-created scourges of civilized humanity are the group of zymotic diseases, or those which arise from infection, and are believed to be due to the agency of minute organisms which rapidly increase in bodies offering favourable conditions, and often cause death. Such diseases are: plague, small-pox, measles, whooping-cough, yellow fever, typhus and enteric fevers, scarlet fever and diphtheria, and cholera. The conditions which especially favour these diseases are foul air and water, decaying organic matter, overcrowding, and other unwholesome surroundings, whence they have been termed "filth diseases." The most terrible and fatal of these--the plague--prevails only where people live under the very worst sanitary conditions as regards ventilation, water supply, and general cleanliness. Till about 250 years ago it was as common in England as small-pox has been during the present century, but a very partial and limited advance in healthy conditions of life entirely abolished it, its place being to some extent taken by small-pox, cholera, and fevers. The exact mode by which all these diseases spread is not known; cholera, typhus, and enteric fever are believed to be communicated through the dejecta from the patient contaminating drinking water. The other diseases are spread either by bodily contact or by transmission of germs through [[p. 6]] the air; but with all of them there must be conditions favouring their reception and increase. Not only are many persons apparently insusceptible through life to some of these diseases, but all the evidence goes to show that, if the whole population of a country lived under thoroughly healthy conditions as regards pure air, pure water, and wholesome food, none of them could ever obtain a footing, and they would die out as completely as the plague and leprosy have died out, though both were once so prevalent in England.
     But during the last century there was no such knowledge, and no general belief in the efficacy of simple, healthy conditions of life as the only effectual safeguard against these diseases. Small-pox, although then, as now, an epidemic disease and of very varying degrees of virulence, was much dreaded, because, owing chiefly to improper treatment, it was often fatal, and still more often produced disfigurement or even blindness. When, therefore, the method of inoculation was introduced from the East in the early part of the eighteenth century, it was quickly welcomed, because a mild form of the disease was produced which rarely caused death or disfigurement, though it was believed to be an effectual protection against taking the disease by ordinary infection. It was, however, soon found that the mild small-pox usually produced by inoculation was quite as infectious as the natural disease, and became quite as fatal to persons who caught it. Towards the end of the last century many medical men became so impressed with its danger that they advocated more attention to sanitation and the isolation of patients, because inoculation, though it may have saved individuals, really increased the total deaths from small-pox.
     Under these circumstances we can well understand the favourable reception given to an operation which produced a slight, non-infectious disease, which yet was alleged to protect against small-pox as completely as did the inoculated disease itself. This was Vaccination, which arose from the belief of farmers in [[p. 7]] Gloucestershire and elsewhere that those who had caught cow-pox from cows were free from small-pox for the rest of their lives. Jenner, in 1798, published his Inquiry, giving an account of the facts which, in his opinion, proved this to be the case. But in the light of our present knowledge we see that they are wholly inconclusive. Six of his patients had had cow-pox when young, and were inoculated with small-pox in the usual way from twenty-one to fifty-three years afterwards, and because they did not take the disease, he concluded that the cow-pox had preserved them. But we know that a considerable proportion of persons in middle age are insusceptible to small-pox infection; besides which even those who most strongly uphold vaccination now admit that its effects die out entirely in a few years--some say four or five, some ten--so that these people who had had cow-pox so long before were certainly notprotected by it from taking small-pox. Several other patients were farriers or stable men who were infected by horse-grease, not by cow-pox, and were also said to be insusceptible to small-pox inoculation, though not so completely as those who had had cow-pox. The remainder of Jenner's cases were six children, from five to eight years old, who were vaccinated, and then inoculated a few weeks or months afterwards. These cases are fallacious from two causes. In the first place, any remnant of the effects of the vaccination (which were sometimes severe), or the existence of scurvy, then very prevalent, or of any other skin-disease, might prevent the test-inoculation from producing any effect.1 The other [[p. 8]] cause of uncertainty arises from the fact that this "variolous test" consisted in inoculating with small-pox virus obtained from the last of a series of successive patients in whom the effect produced was a minimum, consisting of very few pustules, sometimes only one, and a very slight amount of fever. The results of this test, whether on a person who had had cow-pox or who had not had it, was usually so slight that it could easily be described by a believer in the influence of the one disease on the other as having "no effect"; and Dr. Creighton declares, after a study of the whole literature of the subject, that the description of the results of the test is almost always loose and general, and that in the few cases where more detail is given the symptoms described are almost the same in the vaccinated as in the unvaccinated. Again, no careful tests were ever made by inoculating at the same time, and in exactly the same way, two groups of persons of similar age, constitution, and health, the one group having been vaccinated the other not, and none of them having had small-pox, and then having the resulting effects carefully described and compared by independent experts. Such "control" experiments would now be required in any case of such importance as this; but it was never done in the early days of vaccination, and it appears never to have been done to this day. The alleged "test" was, it is true, applied in a great number of cases by the early observers, especially by Dr. Woodville, physician to a small-pox hospital; but Dr. Creighton shows reason for believing that the lymph he used was contaminated with small- [[p. 9]] pox, and that the supposed vaccinations were really inoculations. This lymph was widely spread all over the country, and was supplied to Jenner himself, and we thus have explained the effect of the "vaccination" in preventing the subsequent "inoculation" from producing much effect, since both were really mild forms of small-pox inoculation. This matter is fully explained by Dr. Creighton in his evidence before the Royal Commission, printed in the Second Report. Professor E. M. Crookshank, who has made a special study of cow-pox and other animal diseases and their relation to human small-pox, gives important confirmatory evidence, to be found in the Fourth Report.
     This brief statement of the early history of vaccination has been introduced here in order to give what seems to be a probable explanation of the remarkable fact that a large portion of the medical profession accepted, as proved, that vaccination protected against a subsequent inoculation of small-pox, when in reality there was no such proof, as the subsequent history of small-pox epidemics has shown. The medical and other members of the Royal Commission could not realize the possibility of such a failure to get at the truth. Again and again they asked the witnesses above referred to to explain how it was possible that so many educated specialists could be thus deceived. They overlooked the fact that a century ago was, as regards the majority of the medical profession, a pre-scientific age; and nothing proves this more clearly than the absence of any systematic "control" experiments, and the extreme haste with which some of the heads of the profession expressed their belief in the lifelong protection against small-pox afforded by vaccination, only four years after the discovery had been first announced. This testimony caused Parliament to vote Jenner £10,000 in 1802.
     Ample proof now exists of the fallacy of this belief, since vaccination gives no protection whatever, as will be shown later on. But there was also no lack of [[p. 10]] proof of this failure to protect in the first ten years of the century; and had it not been for the unscientific haste of the medical witnesses to declare that vaccination protected against small-pox during a whole lifetime--a fact of which they had not and could not possibly have any evidence--this proof of failure would have convinced them and have prevented what is really one of the scandals of the nineteenth century. These early proofs of failure will be now briefly indicated.
     Only six years after the announcement of vaccination, in 1804, Dr. B. Moseley, Physician to Chelsea Hospital, published a small book on the cow-pox, containing many cases of persons who had been properly vaccinated and had afterwards had small-pox; and other cases of severe illness, injury, and even death resulting from vaccination; and these failures were admitted by the Royal Jennerian Society in their Report in 1806. Dr. William Rowley, Physician to the St. Marylebone Infirmary, in a work on Cow-pox Inoculation in 1805, which reached a third edition in 1806, gave particulars of 504 cases of small-pox and injury after vaccination, with seventy-five deaths. He says to his brother medical men: "Come and see. I have lately had some of the worst species of malignant small-pox in the Marylebone Infirmary, which many of the faculty have examined and know to have been vaccinated." For two days he had an exhibition in his Lecture Room of a number of children suffering from terrible eruptions and other diseases after vaccination.
     Dr. Squirrel, f

Fetal Cell Lines in Vaccines & Autism

 2015 Spring;30(1):47-70.

Epidemiologic and Molecular Relationship Between Vaccine Manufacture and Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence.



To assess the public health consequences of fetal cell line manufactured vaccines that contain residual human fetal DNA fragments utilizing laboratory and ecological approaches including statistics, molecular biology and genomics.


MMR coverage and autism disorder or autism spectrum disorder prevalence data for Norway, Sweden and the UK were obtained from public and government websites as well as peer reviewed published articles. Biologically, the size and quantity of the contaminating fetal DNA in Meruvax II and Havrix as well as the propensity of various cell lines for cellular and nuclear uptake of primitive human DNA fragments were measured and quantified using gel electrophoresis, fluorescence microscopy and fluorometry. Lastly, genomic analysis identified the specific sites where fetal DNA fragment integration into a child's genome is most likely to occur.


The average MMR coverage for the three countries fell below 90% after Dr. Wakefield's infamous 1998 publication but started to recover slowly after 2001 until reaching over 90% coverage again by 2004. During the same time period, the average autism spectrum disorder prevalence in the United Kingdom, Norway and Sweden dropped substantially after birth year 1998 and gradually increased again after birth year 2000. Average single stranded DNA and double stranded DNA in Meruvax II were 142.05 ng/vial and 35.00 ng/vial, respectively, and 276.00 ng/vial and 35.74 ng/vial in Havrix respectively. The size of the fetal DNA fragments in Meruvax II was approximately 215 base pairs. There was spontaneous cellular and nuclear DNA uptake in HFF1 and NCCIT cells. Genes that have been linked to autism (autism associated genes; AAGs) have a more concentrated susceptibility for insults to genomic stability in comparison to the group of all genes contained within the human genome. Of the X chromosome AAGs, 15 of 19 have double strand break motifs less than 100 kilobases away from the center of a meiotic recombination hotspot located within an exon.


Vaccines manufactured in human fetal cell lines contain unacceptably high levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants. The human genome naturally contains regions that are susceptible to double strand break formation and DNA insertional mutagenesis. The "Wakefield Scare" created a natural experiment that may demonstrate a causal relationship between fetal cell-line manufactured vaccines and ASD prevalence.

The concern being addressed (after the documentation of human DNA, at least in fragmented form) is whether or not such “vaccine DNA” could be incorporated into the living “human DNA” of the host recipient; however, that is only one rather minor concern with the injection of human DNA from one person’s cells into the body of another living human being. From an immunology and inflammology standpoint, the concern is the likelihood that exogenous human DNA would trigger inflammatory responses after being perceived by the immune system and received by receptors for DAMPs (damage associated molecular patterns). Whether this amount of inflammation triggered from human DNA in vaccines is great or small, frequent or uncommon is unknown due to the lack of adequate vaccine testing; however, one would expect it to be of greater consequence in “genetically susceptible” persons and also when co-administered in various mixtures with other vaccines and with their pro-inflammatory ingredients such as aluminum (which exacerbates the release of human DNA[1]), mercury (known to promote immune sensitization) and allergenic antibiotics common in vaccines, including streptomycin[2], polymyxin B[3], neomycin[4], gentamicin and kanamycin[5].
[1] "Although DNA DAMPs are closely associated with the development of autoimmune disease, DNA DAMPs also contribute to the activation of acquired immune responses following vaccination with alum adjuvant. Previous studies have shown that genomic DNA from dying cells induces the maturation of antigen-presenting cells as well as antigen-specific antibody and cytotoxic T cell responses. This suggests that self-DNA DAMPs can activate innate immune responses that induce acquired immunoresponses. Recently, Marichal et al. demonstrated that the adjuvanticity of alum was dependent on self-DNA released from cells at the alum inoculation site (Marichal et al., 2011). NLRP3 appears to be a key sensor in the induction of alum-mediated innate immunity, although its function is only partially dependent upon alum adjuvanticity. " Jounai et al. Recognition of damage-associated molecular patterns related to nucleic acids during inflammation and vaccination. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013 Jan 8;2:168 [2] Romano et al. Anaphylaxis to streptomycin. Allergy. 2002 Nov;57(11):1087-8 [3] Henao MP, Ghaffari G. Anaphylaxis to polymyxin B-trimethoprim eye drops. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Apr;116(4):372 [4] Goh CL. Anaphylaxis from topical neomycin and bacitracin. Australas J Dermatol. 1986 Dec;27(3):125-6 [5] Sánchez-Pérez et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from gentamicin in eyedrops, with cross-reactivity to kanamycin but not neomycin. Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Jan;44(1):54

Research proves childhood illnesses protect from cancer.

Humanity lives synergistically with pathogens (Bacteria and Viruses). They actually have a purpose.
MUMPS: Researchers investigated whether mumps might engender immunity to ovarian cancer through antibodies against the cancer-associated antigen MUC1 abnormally expressed in the inflamed parotid gland.
MEASLES: Albonico found that adults are significantly protected against non-breast cancers — genital, prostate, gastrointestinal, skin, lung, ear-nose-throat, and others — if they contracted measles (odds ratio, OR = 0.45), rubella (OR = 0.38) or chickenpox (OR = 0.62) earlier in life. [Med Hypotheses 1998; 51(4): 315-20].
MEASLES: Montella et al found that contracting measles in childhood reduces the risk of developing lymphatic cancer in adulthood [Leuk Res 2006; 30(8): 917-22].
MEASLES: Alexander found that infection with measles during childhood is significantly protective — it cuts the risk in half — against developing Hodgkin’s disease (OR = 0.53) [Br J Cancer 2000; 82(5): 1117-21].
Measles to the Rescue: A Review of Oncolytic Measles Virus.
MV Clinical trials are producing encouraging preliminary results in ovarian cancer, myeloma and cutaneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and the outcome of currently open trials in glioblastoma multiforme, mesothelioma and squamous cell carcinoma are eagerly anticipated.
Aref S, et al. Viruses. 2016.
MEASLES: Glaser also found that lymph cancer is significantly more likely in adults who were not infected with measles, mumps or rubella in childhood [In J Cancer 2005; 115(4): 599-605].
COMMON INFECTIONS: Gilham found that infants with the least exposure to common infections have the greatest risk of developing childhood leukemia [BMJ 2005; 330: 1294].
EARLY EXPOSURE TO INFECTIONS: Urayama et al also found that early exposure to infections is protective against leukemia [Int J Cancer 2011; 128(7): 1632-43]. Read more….
CHICKEN POX (VARICELLA Canniff J., Donson A.M., Foreman N.K., Weinberg A. Cytotoxicity of glioblastoma cells mediated ex vivo by varicella-zoster virus-specific T cells. J Neurovirol. 2011;17(October (5)):448–454. [PubMed] Canniff et al. reported an association between those individuals with clinical or laboratory evidence of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection and lower risk of glioma.A glioma is a type of tumor that starts in the brain or spine. It is called a glioma because it arises from glial cells.
CHICKEN POX IN CHILDHOOD: Silverberg J.I., Kleiman E., Silverberg N.B., Durkin H.G., Joks R., Smith-Norowitz T.A. Chickenpox in childhood is associated with decreased atopic disorders, IgE, allergic sensitization, and leukocyte subsets. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(February (1):50–58. [PubMed Silverberg et al. also reported that wild-type VZV infection up to 8 years of age was found to be protective against atopic disorders that are thought to be “mediated by suppression of IgE production and allergic sensitization, as well as altered leukocyte distributions. Chicken Pox references taken from Goldman, King STUDY
INFLUENZA - Influenza Virus Infection Elicits Protective Antibodies and T Cells Specific for Host Cell Antigens Also Expressed as Tumor-Associated Antigens: A New View of Cancer ImmunosurveillanceUzoma K. Iheagwara, Pamela L. Beatty, Phu T. Van, Ted M. Ross, Jonathan S. Minden, and Olivera J. Fin
Measles virus for cancer therapy
Stephen J. Russell, M.D., Ph.D. and Kah Whye Peng, Ph.D.
Our bodies are amazing. Even getting an illness is part of our bodies journey to transformation and total health. Dr. Stephanie Seneff (Senior Research Scientist MIT) made this fairly new discovery in regard to the flu virus.
She says we live in a symbiotic relationship with all the other species, even the pathogens. The Flu virus goes into the muscles cells and reprograms them to hand over their sulfate. The flu virus delivers the sulfate to your blood. The sulfate cleans your blood by killing off the weak cells allowing growth for new cells. In effect, the flu virus is rescuing your blood from a future meltdown (more serious illnesses, perhaps cancer).
The potential meltdown was there before getting the flu. It's much like an overcrowded forest that catches fire to thin and clear out the debris and weak trees. It's a natural process. Depending on what we eat, if we exercise, and if we take supplements to fortify our forest (blood) keeping only the strongest trees (cells) to begin with. Getting sick with the flu isn't bad, it's actually good for your body. You are cleaning house.

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Letter to a Doctor on the Vaccination Issue

Respected Dr ___,
I am not opposed to prevention. I question vaccines on very valid grounds based upon views of mainstream doctors and immunologists, my own study, and interaction with parents of vaccine injured children.
I am surprised that so few from among the medical community are engaged in critically studying the practice of vaccination; one that has been accepted blindly depending upon drug industry claims alone. It is a fact that anyone attempting to research into the intricacies of the vaccination process is recoiling in horror and speaking out against the practice.
I do not trust the system because it is muddled with conflict of interest and the greed of the pharmaceutical industry. I understand the anguish of genuine practitioners but also know that what they are recommending is not being followed. The system has been well and truly hijacked.
We do a great disservice to the population by offering risky products as panacea without revealing to them the risks. We make matters worse when we deny the after effects and do not talk about redressing those harmed.
Once again, I am not opposed to prevention. No one is. However we also have to study both health and disease as per new emerging knowledge. Our present knowledge of the immune system is that it encompasses cells, organs, the lymphatic system, the entire body and even the mind, and this new knowledge does not support vaccines any more. Our knowledge of the human microbiome urges us to be careful. Our knowledge of the gut-brain connection calls for extreme caution. Our knowledge of the effects of toxins being passed on to future generations should make us think twice. We know that herd immunity applies only to natural exposure and not to vaccines. We know about the Th1-Th2 imbalance due to vaccines predisposing the body to serious chronic disorders. We also know that vaccination harm is all encompassing and not limited to the body. We know we have not studied the long term effects. 
The emerging epidemics of immune system disorders, inflammatory disorders, toxic syndrome, nervous system disorders, mental and behavioural disorders and the resulting social disruption should scare us all because each of them has been linked to vaccines by peer reviewed published studies. We know that these and even proven vaccine controversies like vaccine failures, vaccine induced epidemics, vaccine induced strain shifts, and antibody related disorders are not a part of the medical curriculum. It is frightening when we realize that the medical fraternity knows next to nothing about vaccines despite the growing body of evidence that is crying out loud. This should trouble the collective conscience.
I think the time has come to actively start looking beyond vaccines. People have lost trust and this trust will further erode as studied dangerous vaccines are being pushed and mandated. This lack of trust is spreading beyond vaccines and antibiotics and people are doing their own research and taking care of themselves instead of blindly depending upon the system. It is only this phenomenon of mass scale rejection of mainstream medicine that is worrying our policy makers and they are taking stringent steps to ensure blind compliance - not a part of science you will agree!
I will trust the system only if people like you and many other sensitive and sensible people that I know of are in total charge. I do not trust the industry and people like Paul Offit, Seth Mnookin, Richard Pan, Bill Gates and now Soumya Swaminathan who are the persons driving vaccines. I have worked in the corporate sector for 24 years and I know how it works and how profit is the only concern. In such situations, science, altruism and common sense are the first casualties. These elements have long collapsed as far as the vaccine industry is concerned.
I am not opposed to vaccines if they can be made toxin free and used selectively during genuine epidemics of diseases that cannot be controlled otherwise. There should also be a system of acceptance of adverse effects and taking care of those killed and injured. Let the huge amounts of money spent on mass vaccination drives be used to usher in health through nutrition, sanitation and other measures. Let us allow acute illnesses be and resist the trend of suppressing them; thereby encouraging the progress towards serious chronic disorders. The present medical set up just loves disease for all the potential for profit that it offers. It abhors health and sanity.
It was India which pioneered this form of prevention as small pox spores were dried in sunlight for a year, stored in leather pouches and a small quantity blown into the faces of vulnerable populations in times when small pox used to make its appearance. This was a good way of mimicking natural exposure with weakened disease organisms. Certain people fell sick, recovered and gained something very close to natural immunity. There were also people who fell violently sick and died as they were susceptible and could not tolerate even this exposure. They would not have fallen sick or died but for this artificial intervention. This should make us ponder and let it sink in that health enhancing measures alone amount to real prevention.
I am not anti-prevention. I am pro-health and am aware that good health prevents many a disease. Acute illness per se is often the body's efforts to heal and rid itself of inherited toxicity or disease states. Vaccines do not deliver health. They manipulate the system in a way that is yet to be fully studied. It is a mass experiment that will always remain so considering the many uncertainties and the nature of the forces that drive it.
Personally I will never submit myself to vaccines anymore. The only silver lining to my experience is that it has opened my eyes and made me capable of taking care of myself - unless of course a truck hits me on the highway!
With love & regards,