All Vaccine Information You Will Ever Need
List of all vaccine
package inserts
Guide for beginning
research
List of peer-reviewed
vaccine research
Asymptomatic carriers
among the vaccinated are spreading the diseases
Recently vaccinated
individuals spread disease
You can't protect
newborns with vaccine boosters
Studies from other
countries (that the US refuses to do) show that unvaccinated kids are healthier
than vaccinated
Vaccine industry
corruption and SIDS
Positive correlation
between number of vaccines given and hospitalization/death
Famous doctor
apologizes for not further educating herself on the risks and injuries from
vaccines
Reasons to not
vaccinate (links provided)
4 questions you need
to ask and know the information behind, before vaccinating
Vaccine shedding
Polio vaccine caused
more paralysis than the wild strain
Vaccines did not save
us- 2 centuries of official statistics
Over 36 Syrian
children died from tainted vaccine-2016
When you vaccinate
malnourished children, many of them die
Vaccines actually
destroy cellular immunity
Vaccine benefits have
been overrated and risk of adverse reactions have been underestimated. Safety
of vaccines has not yet been proven study shows
Flu shot containing
H1N1 has 40 times the rate of miscarriage (in pregnant women) compared to those
who don't get the vaccine according to the study from the National Health
institute
American college of
pediatrics show concern over HPV vaccine leading to premature menopause
HPV vaccine causes
more lethal type of HPV virus to sweep in, in vaccinated individuals-studies
from the CDC
Japan mass lawsuits
for serious hpv vaccine injuries
Immune system
problems associated with neurological disorders like autism
How to get religious
exemption
Info on signing
exemptions for school and how to prove duress
Legalities of
compulsory vaccines
10 years of research
Over 165 published
studies have proven Thimerosal in vaccines are not safe and can cause death
along with many other severe adverse reactions. The ONLY study proving the
“safety” is from the CDC (known for falsifying studies)
Aluminum, a vaccine
adjuvant, has been shown to cross the blood brain barrier and induce cell
damage and death.
Combined toxicity of
aluminum and mercury in early childhood is neurotoxic.
Effects of aluminum
on the brain
Lmyphatic vessels
linked to central nervous system and could explain immune cells ending up in
the brain (vaccines able to break the blood-brain barrier) https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lymphatic-vessels-discovered-central-nervous-system
Video (actual
footage) of what happens to brain neurons in the presence of mercury
Vaccine aluminum
travels into the brain
Aluminum exposure
linked to men's infertility
Herd immunity
Vaccine-induced herd
immunity is scientifically impossible
The deadly
impossibility of herd immunity through vaccination
Project Instinct
Have your doctor sign
this if he insists on vaccines
Vaccine risk to
benefit ratio
Vaccine ingredient
breakdown-link to CDC articles and studies
Vaccine ingredients
and manufacturer information
Dr Suzanne
Humphries-Vaccine Ingredients
New vaccine that will
permanently alter DNA
Tetanus statistics
Why you never need a
tetanus vaccine
Harvard trained
immunologist on safety and efficacy of vaccines
Vaccines are made in
3 different cancer cell lines.
Use of aborted baby
cells in vaccines
Animal
testing/cruelty in all vaccine production
Vaccines turn
immunities against us
Video on science
behind vaccines’ ability to harm the brain
A safe and effective
vaccine alternative that doesn't bypass the natural immune response
Public should be told
vaccines can have long term adverse effects
Pesticide
pyriproxyfen suspected as culprit of microcephaly, not Zika virus
Measles virus being
used to treat cancer
Studies show getting
mumps, measles, chicken pox and influenza all protect against different kinds
of cancer.
Having chicken pox
may reduce your risk of brain cancer
Mumps may protect
against ovarian cancer
Human fetal cell
lines
WI-38, MRC-5, RA
27/3, HEK293
IMR-90: ”The human
diploid fibroblast strain IMR-90 was derived by W.W. Nichols and associates
from the lungs of a 16-week female fetus.
The division potential, viral susceptibilities and other properties have been thoroughly studied such that the line may be considered as an alternate for WI-38 and other standard human lung cell strains.
The cells have been reported to be capable of attaining 58 population doublings before the onset of senescence.”
http://www.atcc.org/.../Product.../tabid/452/Default.aspx..
http://ccr.coriell.org/Sections/Search/Sample_Detail.aspx...
WI-26 VA4: An SV40 transformed derivative of WI-26, a human diploid cell line derived from embryonic lung tissue of a male Caucasian. The cells have SV40 T-Ag but infectious virus has not been rescued.
http://www.cellbankaustralia.com/.../ProductDetail.aspx…
The division potential, viral susceptibilities and other properties have been thoroughly studied such that the line may be considered as an alternate for WI-38 and other standard human lung cell strains.
The cells have been reported to be capable of attaining 58 population doublings before the onset of senescence.”
http://www.atcc.org/.../Product.../tabid/452/Default.aspx..
http://ccr.coriell.org/Sections/Search/Sample_Detail.aspx...
WI-26 VA4: An SV40 transformed derivative of WI-26, a human diploid cell line derived from embryonic lung tissue of a male Caucasian. The cells have SV40 T-Ag but infectious virus has not been rescued.
http://www.cellbankaustralia.com/.../ProductDetail.aspx…
HEK-293: cells were generated in the early 70s by transformation of cultures of normal human embryonic kidney cells with sheared adenovirus 5 DNA in Alex Van der Eb’s laboratory in Leiden, The Netherlands. The human embryonic kidney cells were obtained from previously healthy aborted fetus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HEK_cell...
PER.C6: Cell line from retinal tissue of a 18 week old fetus aborted in 1985, further developed and prepared as cell line in 1995.
http://www.fda.gov/.../ac/01/transcripts/3750t1_01.pdf(Page 91)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed…
RA 27/3: ”Various strains of rubella virus were used. RA 27/3 was isolated previously in this labratory from an aborted fetus.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC375746/... (Page 157)
RA 27/3: Note the RA27/3 strain of rubella virus was observed to induce brain cell death in rats: “The induction of cell death by the Therien strain of rubella virus (RVT), and the vaccine RA27/3 strain, was investigated in mixed glial cell cultures derived from the rat CNS. Cell death induction in Vero and rat glial cells by RVT and RA27/3 was dependent on virus replication. In both cell types and for both virus strains, cell death induction had the hallmarks of apoptosis,”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve…
http://www.sailhome.org/Concerns/Vaccines.html
Published medical
studies that show link between vaccines and autism.
“If something is
meant to alter your immune system enough to protect from a disease, how is it
simultaneously harmless and not able to alter your immune system to make you
develop all these other chronic illnesses?
It's either powerful enough to alter you, or it's not”
It's either powerful enough to alter you, or it's not”
-Julie Weyer Briggs
“The acellular
pertussis vaccine works by creating an immune reaction to the pertussis toxin.
The toxin is made by the pertussis bacteria. There is a lot of confusion about
this. Because the vaccine causes the body to make antibodies to the toxin
rather than the bacteria, NO ONE is immune to the bacteria by getting
vaccinated. ANYONE, including vaccinated individuals, can harbor the bacterium
in their body and pass it along to others. The difference between vaccinated
and unvaccinated individuals is that the vaccinated have a greater chance of
not producing symptoms. This is protective to the individual, not the
"herd." An asymptomatic vaccinated person can pass the bacteria to
others for up to six weeks without realizing it (see this statement from the
FDA:
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm376937.htm).
The vaccine also has a relatively low efficacy rate (see this CDC article for
more info: http://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/pregnant/mom/vacc-effectiveness.html).
It's pretty much impossible to rely on the vaccine for "herd"
protection. The efficacy rate is so low that even if it did prevent
transmission (which it doesn't) and even if 100% of individuals were vaccinated
(which can never happen because not everyone can be vaccinated), you would
still see outbreaks of pertussis.
The reason for the resurgence of pertussis (which has never been eradicated), is because the whole cell pertussis vaccine, which was more effective but had serious side effects, was pulled from the market in the US. Pertussis also cycles, meaning it naturally will wax and wane over the years. This can give an illusion to a resurgence of the disease. There is also more than one type of pertussis bacterium. It is possible that with the vaccine strain being used to inoculate people, the other strain(s) not in the vaccine may opportunistically start to take over and cause more cases of pertussis. (See CDC site for more info.)
The good news for you is that if you are at least somewhat healthy, pertussis shouldn't be life-threatening for you. Many people think they just have a cough when they have pertussis. It's more serious for infants, the elderly and immunocompromised individuals. This means everyone--vaccinated or not--need to keep their germs away from susceptible individuals. And if someone is vaccinated for pertussis, they need to realize they may be asymptomatic carriers and be vigilant about washing their hands when visiting susceptible individuals and not kissing on little babies--even if they aren't sick”
The reason for the resurgence of pertussis (which has never been eradicated), is because the whole cell pertussis vaccine, which was more effective but had serious side effects, was pulled from the market in the US. Pertussis also cycles, meaning it naturally will wax and wane over the years. This can give an illusion to a resurgence of the disease. There is also more than one type of pertussis bacterium. It is possible that with the vaccine strain being used to inoculate people, the other strain(s) not in the vaccine may opportunistically start to take over and cause more cases of pertussis. (See CDC site for more info.)
The good news for you is that if you are at least somewhat healthy, pertussis shouldn't be life-threatening for you. Many people think they just have a cough when they have pertussis. It's more serious for infants, the elderly and immunocompromised individuals. This means everyone--vaccinated or not--need to keep their germs away from susceptible individuals. And if someone is vaccinated for pertussis, they need to realize they may be asymptomatic carriers and be vigilant about washing their hands when visiting susceptible individuals and not kissing on little babies--even if they aren't sick”
--Lisa Cauthers
“Everyone has the
right to true informed consent; to know exactly what the medical procedure
involves, the ingredients of anything that will be injected, and the risk of
adverse effects. With the right of true informed consent comes the right to
accept or refuse the recommended medical treatment or procedure. Without the
right of informed consent, we are giving away our freedom to choose for
ourselves which is one of the most basic of American freedoms. EVERYONE has
some type of bias!! Including doctors, health officials, vaccine researchers,
and parents. It robs us of our basic rights and freedoms to have the government
decide and dictate who's bias' are allowed and whose are not.”
Doctors who explain
clearly why vaccines aren't safe or effective.
1. Dr. Nancy Banks - http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm
1. Dr. Nancy Banks - http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm
7. Dr. Toni Bark - http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield - http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo
9. Dr. Meryl Nass - http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc
10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin - http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl
11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot - http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL
12. Dr. Robert Rowen - http://bit.ly/1SIELeF
13. Dr. David Ayoub - http://bit.ly/1SIELve
Hundreds more doctors testifying that vaccines aren't safe or effective, in these documentaries....
1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic - http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W
Millions of kids are
suffering life long chronic illness from these vaccines.
From the British Medical Journal:
Research into immunisation has been based on the theory that the benefits of immunisation far outweigh the risks from delayed adverse events and so long term safety studies do not need to be performed. When looking at diabetes—only one potential chronic adverse event—we found that the rise in the prevalence of diabetes may more than offset the expected decline in long term complications of H influenzae meningitis. Thus diabetes induced by vaccine should not be considered a rare potential adverse event. The incidence of many other chronic immunological diseases, including asthma, allergies, and immune mediated cancers, has risen rapidly and may also be linked to immunisation.
We believe that the public should be fully informed that vaccines, though effective in preventing infections, may have long term adverse effects. An educated public will probably increasingly demand proper safety studies before widespread immunisation. We believe that the outcome of this decision will be the development of safer vaccine technology.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1114674/
From the British Medical Journal:
Research into immunisation has been based on the theory that the benefits of immunisation far outweigh the risks from delayed adverse events and so long term safety studies do not need to be performed. When looking at diabetes—only one potential chronic adverse event—we found that the rise in the prevalence of diabetes may more than offset the expected decline in long term complications of H influenzae meningitis. Thus diabetes induced by vaccine should not be considered a rare potential adverse event. The incidence of many other chronic immunological diseases, including asthma, allergies, and immune mediated cancers, has risen rapidly and may also be linked to immunisation.
We believe that the public should be fully informed that vaccines, though effective in preventing infections, may have long term adverse effects. An educated public will probably increasingly demand proper safety studies before widespread immunisation. We believe that the outcome of this decision will be the development of safer vaccine technology.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1114674/
"Conclusion
The US childhood immunization schedule requires 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year, the most in the world, yet 33 nations have better IMRs [Infant Mortality Rates]. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants. When nations were grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges (12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26), 98.3% of the total variance in IMR was explained by the unweighted linear regression model. These findings demonstrate a counter-intuitive relationship: nations that require more vaccine doses tend to have higher infant mortality rates.
Efforts to reduce the relatively high US IMR have been elusive. Finding ways to lower preterm birth rates should be a high priority. However, preventing premature births is just a partial solution to reduce infant deaths. A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and IMRs, is essential. All nations—rich and poor, advanced and developing—have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
The US childhood immunization schedule requires 26 vaccine doses for infants aged less than 1 year, the most in the world, yet 33 nations have better IMRs [Infant Mortality Rates]. Using linear regression, the immunization schedules of these 34 nations were examined and a correlation coefficient of 0.70 (p < 0.0001) was found between IMRs and the number of vaccine doses routinely given to infants. When nations were grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges (12–14, 15–17, 18–20, 21–23, and 24–26), 98.3% of the total variance in IMR was explained by the unweighted linear regression model. These findings demonstrate a counter-intuitive relationship: nations that require more vaccine doses tend to have higher infant mortality rates.
Efforts to reduce the relatively high US IMR have been elusive. Finding ways to lower preterm birth rates should be a high priority. However, preventing premature births is just a partial solution to reduce infant deaths. A closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity, and IMRs, is essential. All nations—rich and poor, advanced and developing—have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
Our government has
made suing for vaccine injuries and deaths not possible, because they are a
product labeled as "unavoidably unsafe", per the Supreme Court.
Instead, they fund a Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund with $9.5 MILLION a year
price tag. As of this February 2015, the amount tax payers have paid for
vaccine injuries and deaths is $3,090,780,181.43. Keep in mind the CDC says
less than 10% of reactions are reported. And the process of getting paid for a
vaccine injury is a lengthy and unpromising process. So, that $3 billion is the
just the tip of the iceberg.
http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreport.pdf
http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreport.pdf
Lead developer of HPV
shot comes forward
“Dr. Harper explained
in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already
extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the
rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV
infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises
to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle.
All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above,
despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037
girls have reported adverseside effects from Gardasil™ alone to the Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents
who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At
the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these
vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome
(paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing
suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents
are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine
developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able
to sleep at night. ’About eight in every ten women who have been sexually
active will have HPV at some stage of their life,’ Harper says. ’Normally
there are nosymptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But
in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to
pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.’”
Although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven “there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of her being struck by a meteorite.”
Although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven “there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of her being struck by a meteorite.”
"If you do this
to each disease, you'd be amazed and alarmed. You look at the death and injury
rate from the CDC pinkbook, for the disease. Then, visit VAERS and the Vaccine
Court sites, to examine the death and injury rate for the vaccines. Keeping in
mind, that according to the CDC less than 10% of all adverse reactions are
reported.
We are going to start out slow and easy. I want all my friends who do vaccinate to consider this information because I know a lot of you scroll passed my posts on vaccinations and that is fine, we are allowed to have differing opinions and so long as you look at the evidence no matter what you choose for your family I completely respect that choice.
Just listen to me for one minute. I am going to take the year 2013, and we are going to examine the stats on pertussis provided by the CDC. I will provide those links in the comment section so you can see I'm not pulling these numbers out of my ass, you can read it for yourself. I'm going to run off U.S. stats because their population is higher, they live in closer proximity to each other, so clearly the risk of an outbreak of any "vaccine preventable illness" would be higher, theoretically, and to be perfectly honest our government of Canada makes it really hard to find information.
In the U.S., 2013, there was a total of 12 deaths from pertussis (whooping cough). Of those deaths sadly 10 were under the age of 1 year. The 11th death was in the age range of 75-84 (they don't give specifics). The 12th death was in the age range of 85 and older.
The total amount of whooping cough cases the entire of year of 2013 for the U.S was 28,639.
Now we have the option to head over to the VAERS database. You can download the stats for that year and see all vaccination reactions if you want. It's actually pretty shocking. For now though we will head over to the CDC WONDER program. It's a little harder to navigate but if anyone wants I can walk you through the steps I took to find my result and you can see for yourself. This way we are only looking at the reactions for the DTaP vaccinations. The total number of reported adverse reactions for 2013 (I like to stress the word REPORTED because it is estimated less than 10% of all adverse reactions are ever reported) was 11,694. Of those 30 patients died of their vaccine injuries.
So to conclude, 12 deaths from pertussis, 30 deaths from the vaccination meant to prevent the the illness."
We are going to start out slow and easy. I want all my friends who do vaccinate to consider this information because I know a lot of you scroll passed my posts on vaccinations and that is fine, we are allowed to have differing opinions and so long as you look at the evidence no matter what you choose for your family I completely respect that choice.
Just listen to me for one minute. I am going to take the year 2013, and we are going to examine the stats on pertussis provided by the CDC. I will provide those links in the comment section so you can see I'm not pulling these numbers out of my ass, you can read it for yourself. I'm going to run off U.S. stats because their population is higher, they live in closer proximity to each other, so clearly the risk of an outbreak of any "vaccine preventable illness" would be higher, theoretically, and to be perfectly honest our government of Canada makes it really hard to find information.
In the U.S., 2013, there was a total of 12 deaths from pertussis (whooping cough). Of those deaths sadly 10 were under the age of 1 year. The 11th death was in the age range of 75-84 (they don't give specifics). The 12th death was in the age range of 85 and older.
The total amount of whooping cough cases the entire of year of 2013 for the U.S was 28,639.
Now we have the option to head over to the VAERS database. You can download the stats for that year and see all vaccination reactions if you want. It's actually pretty shocking. For now though we will head over to the CDC WONDER program. It's a little harder to navigate but if anyone wants I can walk you through the steps I took to find my result and you can see for yourself. This way we are only looking at the reactions for the DTaP vaccinations. The total number of reported adverse reactions for 2013 (I like to stress the word REPORTED because it is estimated less than 10% of all adverse reactions are ever reported) was 11,694. Of those 30 patients died of their vaccine injuries.
So to conclude, 12 deaths from pertussis, 30 deaths from the vaccination meant to prevent the the illness."
Here's a great
response to the Washington Post article.
This article points out "7 things 'Vaxxed' won't tell you." We think their 7 things are laughable. We prefer the 9 things our friend Anne Dachel from Age of Autism wrote in the comments.
1) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the people in charge of the vaccine schedule, are also in charge of vaccine safety. This means that they literally have oversight over themselves. Hundreds of their employees have conflict of interest waivers because of direct financial ties to the industry they regulate. The last head of the CDC, Dr. Julie Gerberding, a long-time denier of any link between vaccines and autism, left the agency and became head of the vaccine division at Merck.
2) The FDA allows vaccine makers to conduct much of the safety testing themselves. The FDA merely accepts the results. Furthermore, vaccines are tested individually, yet a child receives multiple vaccines in a single doctor's visit. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-schedule.pdf
3) There has never been a study done on the cumulative effects of the one-size-fits-every-child vaccine schedule in the U.S. What other medical product or procedure could possibly be considered safe for every child? Parents are truly playing "vaccine roulette" when they take their infants in to be vaccinated.
4) There is little incentive to produce a safe product since neither the vaccine makers nor the doctor has any liability for vaccine damage. They have been protected by federal law since 1986. They cannot be sued. Incidentally, the government's compensation program has paid out billions for vaccine injuries, including over 80 cases where the injured party became autistic as a result of vaccination.
5) The 2015 JAMA study mentioned in this story was a large-scale population study. This is kind of science where the results can easily be manipulated to get the desired outcome. This is considered the weakest research, but it's what officials continually use to prove vaccine safety.
6) The government makes absolutely no effort to determine which children may be at risk for a vaccine reaction before injecting a battery of shots into a child at a typical well-baby visit.
7) In 2008 the public learned that medical experts at HHS had conceded the claim of vaccine-induced autism in the case of Hannah Poling, a young Georgia girl who regressed into autism directly after receiving nine vaccines at one time. Hannah had a mitochondrial disorder that made her susceptible to injury from vaccination. No effort has been made to determine what other children have the same vulnerability.
8) In 2008, the late Dr. Bernadine, former head of NIH, was on CBS News and she said that we can't dismiss a link between vaccines and autism because we have never studied the children who were fine and who suddenly lost learned skills and regressed into autism following vaccination. http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4088138n
9) The truth is, we have the most vaccinated kids in the world and some of the sickest. Our schools are filled with children who can't learn, many who are non-verbal, others with diabetes, seizure disorders, behavioral problems, bowel disease, life-threatening allergies, and asthma.
We have an autism rate of two percent of our children and no one can reasonably explain why we don't see the same rate among adults.
For all these reasons, parents need to step back and educate themselves about vaccine safety. What William Thompson's phone conversations reveal is a federal agency rife with corruption and cover-up. It's not just this one study on the MMR. Thompson's many talks with Dr. Hooker cast doubt on all the findings on vaccine safety.
SOURCE: WASHINGTONPOST.COM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/25/7-things-about-vaccines-and-autism-that-the-movie-vaxxed-wont-tell-you/
This article points out "7 things 'Vaxxed' won't tell you." We think their 7 things are laughable. We prefer the 9 things our friend Anne Dachel from Age of Autism wrote in the comments.
1) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the people in charge of the vaccine schedule, are also in charge of vaccine safety. This means that they literally have oversight over themselves. Hundreds of their employees have conflict of interest waivers because of direct financial ties to the industry they regulate. The last head of the CDC, Dr. Julie Gerberding, a long-time denier of any link between vaccines and autism, left the agency and became head of the vaccine division at Merck.
2) The FDA allows vaccine makers to conduct much of the safety testing themselves. The FDA merely accepts the results. Furthermore, vaccines are tested individually, yet a child receives multiple vaccines in a single doctor's visit. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-schedule.pdf
3) There has never been a study done on the cumulative effects of the one-size-fits-every-child vaccine schedule in the U.S. What other medical product or procedure could possibly be considered safe for every child? Parents are truly playing "vaccine roulette" when they take their infants in to be vaccinated.
4) There is little incentive to produce a safe product since neither the vaccine makers nor the doctor has any liability for vaccine damage. They have been protected by federal law since 1986. They cannot be sued. Incidentally, the government's compensation program has paid out billions for vaccine injuries, including over 80 cases where the injured party became autistic as a result of vaccination.
5) The 2015 JAMA study mentioned in this story was a large-scale population study. This is kind of science where the results can easily be manipulated to get the desired outcome. This is considered the weakest research, but it's what officials continually use to prove vaccine safety.
6) The government makes absolutely no effort to determine which children may be at risk for a vaccine reaction before injecting a battery of shots into a child at a typical well-baby visit.
7) In 2008 the public learned that medical experts at HHS had conceded the claim of vaccine-induced autism in the case of Hannah Poling, a young Georgia girl who regressed into autism directly after receiving nine vaccines at one time. Hannah had a mitochondrial disorder that made her susceptible to injury from vaccination. No effort has been made to determine what other children have the same vulnerability.
8) In 2008, the late Dr. Bernadine, former head of NIH, was on CBS News and she said that we can't dismiss a link between vaccines and autism because we have never studied the children who were fine and who suddenly lost learned skills and regressed into autism following vaccination. http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4088138n
9) The truth is, we have the most vaccinated kids in the world and some of the sickest. Our schools are filled with children who can't learn, many who are non-verbal, others with diabetes, seizure disorders, behavioral problems, bowel disease, life-threatening allergies, and asthma.
We have an autism rate of two percent of our children and no one can reasonably explain why we don't see the same rate among adults.
For all these reasons, parents need to step back and educate themselves about vaccine safety. What William Thompson's phone conversations reveal is a federal agency rife with corruption and cover-up. It's not just this one study on the MMR. Thompson's many talks with Dr. Hooker cast doubt on all the findings on vaccine safety.
SOURCE: WASHINGTONPOST.COM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/25/7-things-about-vaccines-and-autism-that-the-movie-vaxxed-wont-tell-you/
……………………………………………..
"There has been
a rash of nonsensical and inaccurate articles making their way across the
Internet recently. The sad part is, most of them are coming from what most
consider "reliable" sources, like NBC, PBS, NY Times, LA Times, etc.
in these articles, we often find "anti-vaxxers"(the popular name for anyone who questions vaccines) being pegged as fringe lunatics, conspiracy theorists, and heartless, self centered individuals, usually with concerns of vaccine effectiveness over vaccine dangers.
If you're anything like me, it bothers you immensely when you see these articles being shared on your timelines, and it makes you want to throw your phone through a window or punch a hole in your computer screen when you see "friends" who have bought the vaccine agenda hook, line, and sinker.
Since the media refuses to look into the matter objectively, and doctors have literally gone through pharma-sponsored training to form the opinions they typically have, it is almost impossible to convince "normal", aka brainwashed, people that you have any semblance of credibility strictly based on personal experience or extensive personal research.
The mainstream media and many hateful(yet influential) pro vaccine groups have succeeded in convincing many that "anti-vaxxers" simply get their information from "mommy blogs" and "conspiracy websites". It's quite a common misconception. Whenever any of the hundreds of doctors, scientists, or celebrities speak out against vaccines based on science and experience, they're immediately labeled as quacks and whackos.
However, despite the urgent attempts to downplay anything anti-vaxxers have to say on the topic, more people than ever are joining our ranks. Our numbers are growing at a pace like never before. The anti-vaccine movement is often said to have started with Jenny Mcarthy or the "discredited" study of Wakefield in '98. Make no mistake, people have been opposing vaccination for the same reason we do since the very first small pox inoculation way back in 1796. This started long before Mcarthy or Wakefield. In '86, the drug companies threatened to stop making vaccines after thousands of parents of vaccine injured/dead kids vowed to take the system down. The DPT(now DTaP) vaccine was a colossal failure and killed/injured more babies than any other vaccine ever recorded. The live Polio vaccine is documented to have actually caused more cases of Polio than it prevented. The flu shot has been completely worthless ever since it was introduced. These are just a few issues, and people were taking notice long before Mcarthy was ever famous, and long before Wakefield ever became a doctor. Parents who opposed vaccines as recently as 15 years ago had it much easier than they do today. The media had apparently not quite yet been bought, congress seemed to have not accepted quite as many back door pharma pocket stuffers, and websites to specifically shame anti-vaxxers hadn't been invented yet.
It was easy enough to just get a vaccine exemption for your kids. Nobody cared. Nobody even knew. It was nobody's business. Disease rates had long since massively declined in civilized countries. Some said the correlation was proof that vaccines worked. Others said the inconsistent correlation didn't prove that, and we had other factors, such as much more sanitary living conditions and healthier, balanced diets to thank.
Enter 2015. It's now a certified shit storm. There's an active agenda to take down all those who oppose vaccination.
Not because disease rates are climbing. They're not, despite record numbers of families opting out.
Not because "anti-vaxxers" are dangerous. They're not, despite many high profile doctors, government officials, and celebrities saying they are.
Not because there's any proof that herd immunity actually exists in today's society. It doesn't, and this has been repeatedly proven in numerous studies and peer reviewed literature.
No, that's not why there's a current campaign to shame, ridicule, and punish parents who question vaccines.
It's because, behind the scenes and out of plain sight, the pharmaceutical giants are petrified. They've been able to shield most of the public from their own clinical study results, from stories of vaccine injury and death, and from vaccine court settlement information. They've been able to pass their products off as safe and effective, because they've achieved the luxury of getting doctors(some of the most influential people on earth) to buy into their lies. While the pharma giants make their tax free billions, they have succeeded in sleeping with the government, and it wasn't a one night stand; it became a dysfunctional marriage. Pharma is the government's sugar daddy, and as a result we are headed toward a medical dictatorship.
Media and Healthcare are basically illegitimate step children, raised to walk in the ways of dishonesty and greed.
Pharma is scared, make no mistake. There is no other way to explain the hard push for mandatory vaccination and defamation of character.
They know the number of vaccine injured are climbing higher and higher.
They know cases of autism are getting harder and harder to explain away.
They know trying to explain the excessively high infant mortality rate as coincidental is a tall order.
And they're starting to realize that they've woken a slumbering dragon. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned; especially when that woman has her pissed off husband standing beside her. Whole families are rising up and taking this battle to them.
And they're not pleasant to deal with.
The only tactic that can be employed is to defame. If pharma can convince enough people that "anti-vaxxers" and parents of vaccine injured kids are just crazy and delusional, they may have a chance to preserve their business, and make even more with more vaccines, and new vaccines in the pipeline. They can treat the sick with their own "medicine", and the vicious cycle can continue.
BUT:
If the nation's citizens rise up in record numbers and get the power back, pharma will crash.
If it can be undoubtedly demonstrated that vaccine science is fatally flawed(enter William Thompson), pharma will fall.
If the general public can see just how dangerous vaccines are and just how many children have been effected, pharma will die.
Only then can we even begin to dream of getting our country back.
It will not be easy. It never has been. Things will get worse before they get better. We are up against Giants. Let's take up our slings."
Written by Matt Jonk
in these articles, we often find "anti-vaxxers"(the popular name for anyone who questions vaccines) being pegged as fringe lunatics, conspiracy theorists, and heartless, self centered individuals, usually with concerns of vaccine effectiveness over vaccine dangers.
If you're anything like me, it bothers you immensely when you see these articles being shared on your timelines, and it makes you want to throw your phone through a window or punch a hole in your computer screen when you see "friends" who have bought the vaccine agenda hook, line, and sinker.
Since the media refuses to look into the matter objectively, and doctors have literally gone through pharma-sponsored training to form the opinions they typically have, it is almost impossible to convince "normal", aka brainwashed, people that you have any semblance of credibility strictly based on personal experience or extensive personal research.
The mainstream media and many hateful(yet influential) pro vaccine groups have succeeded in convincing many that "anti-vaxxers" simply get their information from "mommy blogs" and "conspiracy websites". It's quite a common misconception. Whenever any of the hundreds of doctors, scientists, or celebrities speak out against vaccines based on science and experience, they're immediately labeled as quacks and whackos.
However, despite the urgent attempts to downplay anything anti-vaxxers have to say on the topic, more people than ever are joining our ranks. Our numbers are growing at a pace like never before. The anti-vaccine movement is often said to have started with Jenny Mcarthy or the "discredited" study of Wakefield in '98. Make no mistake, people have been opposing vaccination for the same reason we do since the very first small pox inoculation way back in 1796. This started long before Mcarthy or Wakefield. In '86, the drug companies threatened to stop making vaccines after thousands of parents of vaccine injured/dead kids vowed to take the system down. The DPT(now DTaP) vaccine was a colossal failure and killed/injured more babies than any other vaccine ever recorded. The live Polio vaccine is documented to have actually caused more cases of Polio than it prevented. The flu shot has been completely worthless ever since it was introduced. These are just a few issues, and people were taking notice long before Mcarthy was ever famous, and long before Wakefield ever became a doctor. Parents who opposed vaccines as recently as 15 years ago had it much easier than they do today. The media had apparently not quite yet been bought, congress seemed to have not accepted quite as many back door pharma pocket stuffers, and websites to specifically shame anti-vaxxers hadn't been invented yet.
It was easy enough to just get a vaccine exemption for your kids. Nobody cared. Nobody even knew. It was nobody's business. Disease rates had long since massively declined in civilized countries. Some said the correlation was proof that vaccines worked. Others said the inconsistent correlation didn't prove that, and we had other factors, such as much more sanitary living conditions and healthier, balanced diets to thank.
Enter 2015. It's now a certified shit storm. There's an active agenda to take down all those who oppose vaccination.
Not because disease rates are climbing. They're not, despite record numbers of families opting out.
Not because "anti-vaxxers" are dangerous. They're not, despite many high profile doctors, government officials, and celebrities saying they are.
Not because there's any proof that herd immunity actually exists in today's society. It doesn't, and this has been repeatedly proven in numerous studies and peer reviewed literature.
No, that's not why there's a current campaign to shame, ridicule, and punish parents who question vaccines.
It's because, behind the scenes and out of plain sight, the pharmaceutical giants are petrified. They've been able to shield most of the public from their own clinical study results, from stories of vaccine injury and death, and from vaccine court settlement information. They've been able to pass their products off as safe and effective, because they've achieved the luxury of getting doctors(some of the most influential people on earth) to buy into their lies. While the pharma giants make their tax free billions, they have succeeded in sleeping with the government, and it wasn't a one night stand; it became a dysfunctional marriage. Pharma is the government's sugar daddy, and as a result we are headed toward a medical dictatorship.
Media and Healthcare are basically illegitimate step children, raised to walk in the ways of dishonesty and greed.
Pharma is scared, make no mistake. There is no other way to explain the hard push for mandatory vaccination and defamation of character.
They know the number of vaccine injured are climbing higher and higher.
They know cases of autism are getting harder and harder to explain away.
They know trying to explain the excessively high infant mortality rate as coincidental is a tall order.
And they're starting to realize that they've woken a slumbering dragon. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned; especially when that woman has her pissed off husband standing beside her. Whole families are rising up and taking this battle to them.
And they're not pleasant to deal with.
The only tactic that can be employed is to defame. If pharma can convince enough people that "anti-vaxxers" and parents of vaccine injured kids are just crazy and delusional, they may have a chance to preserve their business, and make even more with more vaccines, and new vaccines in the pipeline. They can treat the sick with their own "medicine", and the vicious cycle can continue.
BUT:
If the nation's citizens rise up in record numbers and get the power back, pharma will crash.
If it can be undoubtedly demonstrated that vaccine science is fatally flawed(enter William Thompson), pharma will fall.
If the general public can see just how dangerous vaccines are and just how many children have been effected, pharma will die.
Only then can we even begin to dream of getting our country back.
It will not be easy. It never has been. Things will get worse before they get better. We are up against Giants. Let's take up our slings."
Written by Matt Jonk
Compiled by
Tanille Shadiack
1 comment