Monday, May 20, 2019

Why are organs failing?

Image result for human organ failure images

Why are organs failing? This is indeed a serious question as we regularly observe internal organ failure and then there is a rush for organ donations and replacement. The body is built in a way that offers maximum protection to internal organs. That they are failing indicates the failure of short sighted suppressive medication.

Organs can seldom fail;
- If the body is allowed to flourish in a biologically conducive non chemicalized environment,
- If acute diseases are respected and allowed to proceed their term without undue interference,
- If people understand that acute diseases are necessary for the body to detoxify and rectify itself,
- If people understand the dynamics of disease; that disease progresses from outside within, and that the health restoration capacity of the body acts from within outward trying to throw the disease matter outside,
- If people are conscious of bodily cycles and the need to maintain them,
- If people respect natural laws and understand the value of nature in human life,
- If people understand the value of optimum nutrition and exercise,
- If people understand the need for mental hygiene, positive mental attitudes, moral laws, and the need for self control and conservation of energy
- If people understand that breaking moral laws and inviting sexually transmitted diseases can affect not only themselves but their progeny and subsequent generations
- If people understand that sharing bodily fluids and blood - even if from supposedly safe sources can have unpredictable consequences on organs

People also need to understand that proceeding on borrowed organs has huge mental and physical consequences and the burden of such a life can be worse than death.

Thursday, May 16, 2019

Pet theories of Allopathy.

Related image
For the modern medicos to become useful members of society, certain pet theories have to be ditched;

a) The body is a machine which can be fixed in parts. Removal of "problematic" parts can still allow the body to function normally
b) The body is a chemical factory that needs regular inputs of chemicals to keep going
c) The body, mind and emotions are separate issues and have no relationship with each other
d) The body does not know how to heal itself, the world would collapse without the increasing retinue of doctors and their interventions
e) The environment is an enemy conspiring to kill the body
f) Bacteria and viruses are always poised to attack the body
g) Acute diseases serve no purpose and all diseases must be tackled on a war footing. Lack of acute diseases is a desirable state.
h) Extreme toxins in material doses are extremely beneficial if prescribed by a doctor who is blissfully ignorant of toxicology and susceptibility.

Only after these huge fallacies are discarded can they begin to learn about health.

Wednesday, May 01, 2019

Vaccines: Where are the placebo controlled trials?

No photo description available.

The problem is that no true double blind inert placebo studies have ever been done period, not one on any vaccine or adjuvant! No one can provide you one. The ingredient thirmerosal has never had a double blind placebo controlled study done on it itself. The one done in 1929 gives no evidence to prove thimerosal is safe yet the government (CDC) uses it as the adjuvant anyway. That whole correlation does not equal causation claim just has to go out the window because there can’t be that many coincidences! You cannot study a drug using a adjuvant against another drug when the adjuvant itself is untested. The whole process was/is/has been a sham from the beginning! The CDC could never prove it to Congress. (See the video)Then going forward when they removed thimerosal, they used the old vaccines-to test the new versions, that isn’t science that just doesn’t work. The new adjuvant aluminum has never been tested. That’s the real debate here the prime underlying issue to this whole debate... 

From congressional testimony Monday 2002 the only adjuvant test ever done was in 1929

The CDC has no inert placebo studies on any adjuvants and now they use aluminum and no inert placebo studies have ever been done on that adjuvant so you’re still in the same place. As the adjuvant itself may be causing the damage.

Congressional testimony. Problem is is now more people in Congress are bought off by the pharmaceutical companies.

Here's a few examples of vaccine testing. They are not tested against placebos like you would think, they are tested against other vaccines :

Daptacel tested against DTP and DT 

Infanrix tested againt Pediarix. Both groups administered varying combinations of HepB, IPV, HIB, PCV, MMR & Varicella vaccines at the same time.

Kinrix tested against Infanrix. Both groups also received IPV and MMR at same time. 

German study: test group =Pediarix AND HIB versus control group = Infanrix, HIB AND OPV.
USA study: test group = Pediarix, HIB, PCV versus control group = Infanrix, Hep B, IPV, HIB, PCV

Pentacel (5 in 1: Dtap, Polio, HIB) tested against already licensed and non-licensed combinations of those vaccines. Both test and control groups also received PCV, HepB (and MMR at the last dose) at the same time.

Quadracel (4 in 1: Dtap & Polio) tested against already approved Daptacel & IPOL vaccines. Both test and control groups also received mmr and varicella vaccines at same time. 



ActHIB reactions observed after administering ActHib or ActHib plus Daptacel, IPOL & PCV. No group did not get ActHib at all. 

Hiberix tested against previously licensed HIB vaccines and both groups given various combinations of pediarix, PCV, rotarix & HepB at the same time.

MenHibrix (Meningococcal & HIB) tested against a single licensed HIB vaccine. Both groups given various combinations of Pediarix, PCV, MMR or Varicella vaccines at the same time.

PedVaxHib (Meningococcal & HIB) tested against another form of pedvaxhib or a placebo. All groups given DTP and OPV at the same time.


Hep A

Havrix - all groups received Havrix. Group 1: Havrix Group, 2: Havrix and MMR, Group 3 Havrix and Varicella.

TwinRix (Hep A & Hep 
😎 tested against already approved Hep & and B vaccines given separately (Havrix & Engerix-B). 


Hep B

Engerix-B given to all test subjects and observed for reactions. No control group was observed or compared.

Recombivax given to all test subjects. Infants and adults simply observed for reactions. Children compared the 2 vs 3 dose schedule.



Gardasil tested against aluminum adjuvant or a "saline placebo". However, the saline placebo is made up of: water, 9.56mg sodium chloride, 0.78mg L-histidine and 50micrograms polysorbate-80. 

Gardasil 9 tested against regular Gardasil. 



All flu vaccines observed for reactions, no control group, and/or against other flu vaccines.



MMRII, adverse event observation of those who receive MMR.

ProQuad (mmr+varicela) tested against MMRII + Varivax given together.


Meningococcal ACWY

Menactra tested against Menomune OR a group receiving PCV, MMRV and HepA instead.

Menomune was tested against Menactra.

Menvo was tested against groups getting typical childhood vaccines or a compararative vaccine.


Meningococcal B

Bexsero tested against either a meningococcal ACWY vaccine, Japanese encephalitis vaccine or an aluminum placebo.

Trumenba tested against groups getting other vaccines and/or a "saline placebo". However, the saline placebo is made up of: water, 9.56mg sodium chloride, 0.78mg L-histidine and 50 micrograms polysorbate-80.


Pneumococcal (PCV13)

Prevnar 13 tested against the old prevnar:



IPOL (Inactivated Polio) tested by observing subjects who got IPOL, DTP & Tripedia vaccines at same time.



Adacel tested against Td vaccine.

Boostrix tested against Td vaccine. Some participants also received meningococcal or flu vaccines at the same time.



TD Generic- states "Data on adverse reactions following fluid and adsorbed preparations of MassBiologics’ Td with various doses of the diphtheria and tetanus components have been reported in a series of studies." and also that it can be used to complete the dtap series but safety and efficacy has not been evaluated. Does not list study results.

Tennivac tested against a vaccine called Decavac.



Varivax claims placebo based trials and later in the insert states no placebo based trials took place. Then describes trials with varying dosages of antigens and dosing schedules.


***Rotavirus and Pneumovax actually claim placebo studies but the contents of their placebo were undetermined.

Saturday, April 27, 2019

What vaccines have been linked to autism?

Image result for autism images

What vaccines have been linked to autism?
- Hep B vaccine (CDC Verstraeten study lying unpublished, C M Gallagher et al)
- MMR vaccine (CDC DeStefano study exposed by co-author, directly and indirectly linked by several other studies)
- Chicken Pox vaccine (Dr Theresa Deisher)
- Thimerosal (mercury containing compound in vaccines, several studies). All non live virus vaccines contain this compound. 
- Aluminium adjuvant in vaccines (Dr Stephanie Seneff et al, Mathew Mold et al, Christopher Shaw). Contained in Hep A, Hep B, Tetanus, DPT, HPV, Hib, Pneumoccocal, Pentavalent, Hexavalent
- DPT vaccine (mentioned in package insert, now removed from FDA website)
- DNA material in vaccines (Helen V. Ratajczak). DNA material exists in MMR, Chicken pox, Hep A, Rotavirus, polio, adenovirus, rabies, and shingles vaccines
- Encephalopathy after vaccination with children suffering "autism like" symptoms - US Vaccine Court that has awarded compensation to 85 such children so far, Vaccine Court designated expert Dr Andrew Zimmermann.

Vaccine Nightmare: And yet, vaccinate at any cost!

Related image

While you are dreaming, the dream seems real to you. After you awake you are amazed at how you could consider it real. You look around at sleeping people and know they too are trapped in their dream worlds. You wait for them to wake up. Vaccination is that dream which takes time to break as it promises an Utopian world free from death, disease and suffering.
However when those very things hit you as you submit to that dream you suffer a rude awakening. Vaccination is not a good idea. This practice targets infants and children and suffers huge ethical issues. Ethics does not recommend indiscriminate medical interventions particularly on healthy subjects. These subjects being infants and children the issue becomes even more perplexing.
Consider this against the practices of other systems of medicine. Let alone medicate the healthy, they are extremely cautious even while treating sick children. While ayurveds frown on rural practices like giving a drop of honey to infants at intervals claiming it improves the immune system, classical homeopaths will balk at giving remedies directly to infants and give it to the breastfeeding mother who can then pass it on to the child along with the breast milk.
Even mainstream science does not advocate anything except breast milk to an infant. Not even water. One wonders how the many vaccines, containing seriously debatable ingredients, are injected during such a sensitive period. Scientific studies now stress on the benefits of natural childhood illnesses and how breastfeeding and natural exposures lead to a strong immune system and a healthy microbiome - a sine qua non for a healthy life.
There are many studies now to prove that vaccines irreversibly affect the immune system balance and can cause serious autoimmune disorders. These and other serious damage from vaccine ingredients are listed in vaccine package inserts and in confidential reports submitted by vaccine manufacturers to the federal agencies who sit on them doing nothing.
Vaccines are never adequately tested for safety - the safety tests being rigged by manufacturers to show that they are safe. They are not tested against any inert placebo but against the same vaccine minus the antigen - a process that defies logic. Vaccines are given in bunches - a procedure that has never been tested. The effects of the entire schedule are never tested. Long term studies are never done.
There are no studies to compare the health status of vaccinated vs the not vaccinated. Agencies are sitting on studies that reflect great harm from vaccines. The state of health of today’s children abundantly reflects that harm.
Vaccines are actually tested only after they are marketed. Considering that post marketing administration is a phase iv clinical trial, all rules are thrown to the winds as there is no apparatus to track that harm and rather adverse effects are termed 'coincidence'. Rules for reporting of adverse effects have been tweaked so that vaccines cannot be linked to the harm they inflict.
Doctors, nurses and health care workers are ticked off for reporting adverse events so as not to 'alarm the public'.
The chronic disease and cancer epidemics can be described in three words; autoimmune, inflammatory, immunotoxic. Vaccines cause exactly this! Thus vaccines are the only medical intervention that can be connected with all disease states we witness today.
Vaccines are now being made mandatory. Schemes are afoot to make them mandatory for adults too. Under these circumstances the public should not wait for the experts to declare harm. These experts have been bought. The industry rules the game. It is time for mass protests. It is time for non cooperation. It is time to protect our children. It is time to protect our health.

And yet, vaccinate at any cost!

The aim is to vaccinate each and every child regardless of opposition and consequences. Those engaged in this task know very well that there is serious opposition to vaccination based on science and that they have industry sponsored trash in their hands with which they are countering the opposition. There is no attempt to sit and and answer or even consider the points put forward by the doctors and scientists who have critically examined the issue. 

The constant vilification of those raising critical questions serves to sideline the growing anger and continue vaccinating the children. Even Court orders are being ignored. Since 1942 it is known that vaccines cannot prevent disease. Today as per their own records vaccines are connected to 248 serious diseases and disorders including death. Children are today seriously ill and childhood is lost. Research shows most childhood illnesses serve a purpose and that they are beneficial for the child. 

Yet vaccination does not stop. Why? What is even more disconcerting is that independent investigations find lack of the antigens in vaccines people are supposed to build antibodies against, or the quantity of antigens is so low it cannot provoke the body to produce antibodies. The whole thing appears very sinister. What is the purpose behind injecting every child with known and decidedly dangerous toxins? Why are governments participating in this genocide? Why are doctors groups silent and even justifying this mass poisoning? What the heck is going on?

Friday, April 19, 2019

Herd immunity does not exist.

Image result for Herd images

Junk Science Week: Vaccinating the 'herd'

Mass vaccination advocates rely on 'herd immunity' to make their case. But it doesn’t exist

Mass vaccination advocates rely on ‘herd immunity’ to make their case. But it doesn’t exist
Cracked beaker“When vaccination rates are very high, as they still are in the nation as a whole, everyone is protected,” explained USA Today in a recent editorial entitled “Vaccine opt-outs put public health at risk.”
“This ‘herd immunity’ protects the most vulnerable, including those who can’t be vaccinated for medical reasons, infants too young to get vaccinated and people on whom the vaccine doesn’t work. But herd immunity works only when nearly the whole herd joins in. When some refuse vaccinations and seek a free ride, immunity breaks down and everyone is more vulnerable.”
The concept of “herd immunity” first materialized in the 1930s, when Johns Hopkins University’s Arthur Hedrich discovered that, after 55% of Baltimore’s population acquired measles (and thus immunity to measles), the rest of the population, or “herd,” became protected. This concept provides today’s rationale for insisting that everyone be vaccinated.
Measles outbreaks occur even when the vaccinated population exceeds 95%
“If you only risked your own health by not getting vaccinated, that would be your business,” mass vaccination advocates state. “But when your failure to get vaccinated endangers me or my child, that becomes my business.” It’s a powerful argument, except for one thing — herd immunity in vaccinated populations has been repeatedly disproven.
In November 1966, in announcing a mass vaccination program for measles that would exceed the 55% level reached in Baltimore, the U.S. Public Health Service confidently announced that “Effective use of these vaccines during the coming winter and spring should insure the eradication of measles from the United States in 1967.”
When measles failed to be eradicated, public health experts decided that a 70% or 75% vaccination rate would secure herd immunity. When that proved wrong, the magic number rose to 80%, 83%, 85%, and then it became 90%, according to a 2001 Health Services Research report. Later health experts commonly cited 95%.
But that too was insufficient — measles outbreaks occur even when the vaccinated population exceeds 95%, leading some to say a 98% or 99% vaccination rate is needed to protect the remaining 1% or 2% of the herd. But even that may fall short, since outbreaks occur in fully vaccinated populations.
“The target would be to have 100% of the population vaccinated,” Dr. Gregory Taylor of the Public Health Agency of Canada recently told CBC, voicing an increasingly common perspective among public health professionals. At that point, the balance of the herd that would be protected through mass vaccination would be precisely 0.
But even vaccinating 100% of the population wouldn’t be enough, say scientists at the Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group, because the measles vaccine is a dud with some people, offering no protection at all, and its effectiveness wanes with others, even if they get boosters. According to Tetyana Obukhanych of Stanford University’s School of Medicine, the measles vaccine works as planned with only 25% of the population, leaving the majority of adults who have been vaccinated as children with little or no protection. Up to half of today’s cases involve adults.
Unlike childhood measles, adult measles is dangerous: 25% of cases require hospitalization. Measles is especially dangerous when contracted by expectant mothers — studies of hospital outcomes in Los Angeles and Houston found that most suffered serious complications, some died, and their babies often died in the womb.
The dangers extend to infants who, as USA Todaypoints out, are too young to be vaccinated. These entirely helpless members of “the herd” depend on antibodies inherited from their mothers. Yet previously vaccinated mothers have few antibodies to pass on, depriving their babies of protection. The only tried-and-true way for mothers to safeguard their infants — those most at risk of death from measles — remains nature’s way: by ensuring that the mother had previously contracted natural measles.
In fact, herd immunity — so elusive today — fully existed prior to the vaccine’s introduction. Virtually 100% of the population then contracted measles, typically as children, giving everyone lifelong immunity — and future mothers the means to protect their offspring. In mass vaccinating us, scientists of the 1960s didn’t realize that infecting us with the measles vaccine — a weak version of the natural measles virus — would give us a weak version of the defenses our bodies develop to the real thing.
Ironically, the Public Health Service considered measles generally benign in the pre-vaccine era. “Complications are infrequent and, with adequate medical care, fatality is rare…. Immunity following recovery is solid and lifelong in duration,” its chief of epidemiology, Alexander Langmuir, acknowledged in “Epidemiologic basis for eradication of measles in 1967.”
Why, then, did he decide to eradicate this generally harmless and beneficial disease? “To those who ask me, ‘Why do you wish to eradicate measles,’ I reply with the same answer that Hilary used when asked why he wished to climb Mt. Everest. He said, ‘Because it is there.’ To this may be added, ‘…and it can be done.’”
Herd immunity sounds fine in theory. But as Stanford’s Dr. Obukhanych concluded, “As with any garbage in-garbage out type of theory, the expectations of the herd-immunity theory are bound to fail in the real world.”
Lawrence Solomon is research director of Consumer Policy